This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Incident Fatigue: When Engineers Stop Being Curious

When alerts keep firing

and teams quietly stop investigating

There’s a moment every on-call engineer eventually reaches.

The alert fires.

You look at it.

And instead of urgency…

you feel nothing.

No panic.
No curiosity.
No adrenaline.

Just one quiet thought:

“Here we go again.”

This is called incident fatigue.

And it quietly changes how teams respond to production problems.

⚠️ What Incident Fatigue Looks Like

Incident fatigue is not burnout.

Engineers still respond.

They still fix things.

They still stay online.

But something important disappears.

Curiosity.

Investigations become shorter.

Fixes become faster.

Understanding becomes smaller.

Incidents close quickly.

But the system doesn’t actually improve.

🧠 The Dangerous Pattern

Over time teams learn a subtle lesson:

“Fix it quickly and move on.”

That works in the short term.

But it slowly creates a system where:

• alerts repeat
• fixes don’t stick
• incidents return

Speed increases.

But learning disappears.

🎯 A Question For Engineers

Think about the last alert you received.

What did you feel first?

Urgency?
Curiosity?
Or resignation?

The earliest signal of incident fatigue

doesn’t appear in dashboards.

It appears in behavior.

🎥 Watch the Full Episode

In today’s breakdown I explain:

• The Incident Fatigue Loop
• Why fast incident recovery can hide risk
• How strong teams restore curiosity during incidents

👉 Watch the full episode
https://youtu.be/e4M1xTcb4C8